Or 'micro-squabbling.' Whatever the correct name for it is, arguments in the Twitterverse are hilarious. Not only are they more personal than they were in the good old days of HTML chats (re: help, I broke my 'refresh' button) but they're damn well efficient. Anyone who can argue quickly and effectively within 140 characters or less gets a big fat gold star in my books. Even if your name is Jason Snell. Aaanndd.. even if you're a bit of a wimp. It's okay. You're a Mac enthusiast. I get it. Shh, shh, it's going to be all right.
Once upon a time, in the land of the Twits, a middle-aged editor retweeted something that only an Mac enthusiast would believe actually proved something:
saying an iPad is "just a big iPod Touch" is like saying a 30" monitor is "just a big 13" monitor"
I'll personally pay anyone $100 right now if they can make that statement make anything close to coherrent sense.
So, being the Apple misanthropist that I am, I replied to this retweet, saying:
uh...? epic fail on trying to effectively prove a point.
Not expecting anything in reply, I was delighted when my 'mention' was noticed and even more pleased with the ensuing ruckus I'd caused.
If you meant your use of the hackneyed "epic fail," uh, yeah.
High five, Mr. Snell. Funny yet subtly insulting, and even up to date with current internet lingo trends. Ku-fucking-dos, my friend.
I could have left it at that, but it would have made for a shitty story later on. So I countered:
no, i meant your sad attempt at defending a useless piece of technology by using ridiculously bogus comparisons. but nice try.
To which he replied:
I don't know if the iPad is a good product or not, but if you have already decided that it sucks, can you at least not be rude about it?
And replied again:
That last tweet was for the rude Canadian who has decided the iPad is "a useless piece of technology" and I should never suggest otherwise.
And again:
I know, a rude Canadian. I'm as shocked as you are.
I guess he thought he'd recognize his own oxymoron before I did.
He went on for another hour or so, bouncing between a bunch of pissed off Canadian tweeters, and more than a few asshole Americans pounding their chests like frat boys in agreement, and even defending himself against a few intelligent tweeters who agreed with me. In my own defense, I was (and still am, thank you very much) probably one of his only Mac-hating followers -- there
is method to my madness, I swear.
AND for the record, his whole bit about "I'm not allowed to suggest otherwise," implying that I don't think anyone who likes the iPad should be able to voice their opinions as to why they do... that's not what I was implying at all.
Rule Numero Uno: If you want to defend something like the iPad, you best be making at least a remotely convincing argument for it. You know, one that actually makes a shred of sense. Por favor.
Sigh.
Alas, my fifteen minutes has come and gone. My claim to fame for now is that Jason Snell, renowned editor of Macworld, thinks I'm a "rude Canadian."
Cool.
I think he's a pretentious Apple-store turd,
but I'll get over it.
As for the aforementioned gold star... He still gets one. For now.